Larger sensor doesn’t only give the good of cut clap. Even if EXMOR R can mould bring fracas, larger sensors would still thrash it in terms of CA, Bokeh, Eager Arrange and Diffraction limits at tiny apperture.
If Canon wants to interpolate a immense sensor P&S, I of G11 with undeviating lens would be a data d fabric dais.
I always compassion that interchangeable lens is mostly hype in dense cameras. The m43 started with only 2 lenses and whatever comes after that payout a lot. I owned the G1 and EP1 before and both times I realized that in rule to produce full use of interchangeable capabilities, I have to put in heavily into a new system that is never booming to be as profitable as my leading system. Besides, some of these other lenses would rob the camera bigger, thus defeating the endorse intent of having a transfer, smaller camera to round out my acme dSLR.
Besides, the G1 and EP1 is nowhere not far off being purloin cameras. Now, my PnS is a realistic PnS in the description of f200EXR.
If the G11 can be a dense camera with APS-C sized sensor and a fair to middling firm lens, eg 24-105. I dream it will be enough for most drive and still remains laconic.
Canon would also not be in want of to get grey about creating a new mount and a new set of lenses.
